i594 work around?
Forum rules
Please keep it civil...
Please keep it civil...
- Godspyro
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 2925
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:50 am
- City: Spokane
- State: WA
- Favorite Firearm: fire stick
- Next Firearm: Bible
- SGT Supporter: Yes
- Location: Greater Spokane Area
i594 work around?
Come on guys I know you want to shoot me down
9.41.010
(9) "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.
(10) "Gun" has the same meaning as firearm.
If a "firearm" is missing a bolt, slide etc it would not be capable of fireing a projectile and would not be concidered a firearm per state law correct?
Sounds like stripped lowers are no problem at all, firearm "parts" that could be assembled into a firearm quickly would technically be legal as well. It doesn't matier that federal law defines it as because it would happen in washington.
Come on BB, tell me I'm wrong!
9.41.010
(9) "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.
(10) "Gun" has the same meaning as firearm.
If a "firearm" is missing a bolt, slide etc it would not be capable of fireing a projectile and would not be concidered a firearm per state law correct?
Sounds like stripped lowers are no problem at all, firearm "parts" that could be assembled into a firearm quickly would technically be legal as well. It doesn't matier that federal law defines it as because it would happen in washington.
Come on BB, tell me I'm wrong!
Prov 6:6 Go to the ant, O sluggard, Observe her ways and be wise.
RCW 9.41.010
(9) "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.
Quotes are stupid. -The Mechanic
RCW 9.41.010
(9) "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.
Quotes are stupid. -The Mechanic
- Flawlessfoose
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 2614
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:18 pm
- City: Spokane Valley
- State: Wa
- Next Firearm: M134
Re: i594 work around?
I don't really want to be the one to find out first hand, but I think your definitely on to something here !!
Come on BB, tell him he's wrong !
Come on BB, tell him he's wrong !
WARNING... SIGS ARE ADDICTIVE KEEP OUT OF REACH OF ADULTS .
- JasonH
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 9:50 am
- City: Spokane Valley
- Next Firearm: M1 Carbine
- SGT Supporter: Yes
- Location: Spokane
Re: i594 work around?
Godspyro wrote:Come on guys I know you want to shoot me down
So let’s say I have a MAK-90, and I go and remove the bolt and piston assembly from it. Making tow groups of parts on my table
By your rational, I could sell the two groups of that firearm as parts because neither in their disassembled state can fire a projectile?
But, would it need to be two separate transactions?
You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door to the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.
-John R. Cash
-John R. Cash
-
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 9:13 am
- City: Nine Mile Falls
- State: WA
- Favorite Firearm: All of them!!
- Next Firearm: Browning Hells Canyo
Re: i594 work around?
The transaction with the serial # still has to do ffl paper work .
" Having you around is like losing 2 good men."
- Flawlessfoose
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 2614
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:18 pm
- City: Spokane Valley
- State: Wa
- Next Firearm: M134
Re: i594 work around?
Where does it say that in the law ?Call Turner wrote:The transaction with the serial # still has to do ffl paper work .
WARNING... SIGS ARE ADDICTIVE KEEP OUT OF REACH OF ADULTS .
-
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:56 pm
- City: spokane
- Favorite Firearm: M60
- Next Firearm: who knows?
- Location: northside spokane, wa
Re: i594 work around?
Laws suck but are laws
Last edited by crazyjoe on Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 12:16 pm
- City: Hayden
- State: ID
- Favorite Firearm: 1911
- Next Firearm: 338 Lapua
- SGT Supporter: Yes
Re: i594 work around?
Godspyro wrote:Come on guys I know you want to shoot me down
9.41.010
(9) "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.
(10) "Gun" has the same meaning as firearm.
If a "firearm" is missing a bolt, slide etc it would not be capable of fireing a projectile and would not be concidered a firearm per state law correct?
Sounds like stripped lowers are no problem at all, firearm "parts" that could be assembled into a firearm quickly would technically be legal as well. It doesn't matier that federal law defines it as because it would happen in washington.
Come on BB, tell me I'm wrong!
I think you are on to something as long as it is a private sale with in the state of Washington and all other federal laws were obeyed. I will do some research.
- thumpar
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 5118
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:40 am
- City: Spokane
- State: WA
- Favorite Firearm: All of them
- Next Firearm: The next good deal.
- SGT Supporter: Yes
- Location: Whitworth
Re: i594 work around?
But that is only over state lines or when purchasing new from an FFL and is a federal law not state. It seems that 594 doesn't have a real good definition of "firearm".Call Turner wrote:The transaction with the serial # still has to do ffl paper work .
Why is there never enough time to do it right the first time, But always enough time to do it again? - Don S RIP
2/3rds of the worlds surface would be wasted if it wasn't for boating.
2/3rds of the worlds surface would be wasted if it wasn't for boating.
-
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 12:16 pm
- City: Hayden
- State: ID
- Favorite Firearm: 1911
- Next Firearm: 338 Lapua
- SGT Supporter: Yes
Re: i594 work around?
I can't find any reason what Godspyro stated would be unlawful. I will say that IMHO if I sold you a disassembled firearm that would not fly. IMHO If I sold you an AR lower and you then went and purchased the rest of the firearm from other sources that would be lawful under current State law. Just to be clear here we are just discussing state law not giving advice or planning on doing any of what we are discussing.
- Godspyro
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 2925
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:50 am
- City: Spokane
- State: WA
- Favorite Firearm: fire stick
- Next Firearm: Bible
- SGT Supporter: Yes
- Location: Greater Spokane Area
Re: i594 work around?
Of course we wouldn't make recommendations, after all if someone sold a Powder actuated tool or a potato gun that would be a clear violation of state law, but if I sold you an ar15 that was unable to fire a projectile (missing bcg) that would violate no law, assuming both parties are wa citizens and the transfer takes place in the great state of Washington.
Prov 6:6 Go to the ant, O sluggard, Observe her ways and be wise.
RCW 9.41.010
(9) "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.
Quotes are stupid. -The Mechanic
RCW 9.41.010
(9) "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.
Quotes are stupid. -The Mechanic
-
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 12:16 pm
- City: Hayden
- State: ID
- Favorite Firearm: 1911
- Next Firearm: 338 Lapua
- SGT Supporter: Yes
Re: i594 work around?
Godspyro wrote:Of course we wouldn't make recommendations, after all if someone sold a Powder actuated tool or a potato gun that would be a clear violation of state law, but if I sold you an ar15 that was unable to fire a projectile (missing bcg) that would violate no law, assuming both parties are wa citizens and the transfer takes place in the great state of Washington.
Agreed if the BCG was purchased from another source.
- Godspyro
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 2925
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:50 am
- City: Spokane
- State: WA
- Favorite Firearm: fire stick
- Next Firearm: Bible
- SGT Supporter: Yes
- Location: Greater Spokane Area
Re: i594 work around?
Bring a friend with you, I can gift them a bcg
Prov 6:6 Go to the ant, O sluggard, Observe her ways and be wise.
RCW 9.41.010
(9) "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.
Quotes are stupid. -The Mechanic
RCW 9.41.010
(9) "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.
Quotes are stupid. -The Mechanic
-
- Gun Trader
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 8:25 pm
- City: North of Spokane, WA
- Favorite Firearm: one that goes bang!!
Re: i594 work around?
And what makes this needed? Do you feel a transaction for the bcg as well as the "remainder" of the firearm would be considered a single firearm transaction?Orphan wrote:Godspyro wrote:Of course we wouldn't make recommendations, after all if someone sold a Powder actuated tool or a potato gun that would be a clear violation of state law, but if I sold you an ar15 that was unable to fire a projectile (missing bcg) that would violate no law, assuming both parties are wa citizens and the transfer takes place in the great state of Washington.
Agreed if the BCG was purchased from another source.
2 bills of sale and 2 monetary transactions and maybe go as far as "different" dates on the bills of sale.
-
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 12:16 pm
- City: Hayden
- State: ID
- Favorite Firearm: 1911
- Next Firearm: 338 Lapua
- SGT Supporter: Yes
Re: i594 work around?
pacnw wrote:And what makes this needed? Do you feel a transaction for the bcg as well as the "remainder" of the firearm would be considered a single firearm transaction?Orphan wrote:Godspyro wrote:Of course we wouldn't make recommendations, after all if someone sold a Powder actuated tool or a potato gun that would be a clear violation of state law, but if I sold you an ar15 that was unable to fire a projectile (missing bcg) that would violate no law, assuming both parties are wa citizens and the transfer takes place in the great state of Washington.
Agreed if the BCG was purchased from another source.
2 bills of sale and 2 monetary transactions and maybe go as far as "different" dates on the bills of sale.
The difference would be selling a disassembled firearm vs selling firearms parts
- Godspyro
- SGT Premium Supporter
- Posts: 2925
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:50 am
- City: Spokane
- State: WA
- Favorite Firearm: fire stick
- Next Firearm: Bible
- SGT Supporter: Yes
- Location: Greater Spokane Area
Re: i594 work around?
If we are talking a federal definition of firearm yes but but the state does not define a firearm as something that may someday fire a projectile,Orphan wrote:pacnw wrote:And what makes this needed? Do you feel a transaction for the bcg as well as the "remainder" of the firearm would be considered a single firearm transaction?Orphan wrote:Godspyro wrote:Of course we wouldn't make recommendations, after all if someone sold a Powder actuated tool or a potato gun that would be a clear violation of state law, but if I sold you an ar15 that was unable to fire a projectile (missing bcg) that would violate no law, assuming both parties are wa citizens and the transfer takes place in the great state of Washington.
Agreed if the BCG was purchased from another source.
2 bills of sale and 2 monetary transactions and maybe go as far as "different" dates on the bills of sale.
The difference would be selling a disassembled firearm vs selling firearms parts
if I sell you some abs pipe with fittings, a flint sparker and some hair spray have I sold you a disabled firearm or a bunch of parts?
Prov 6:6 Go to the ant, O sluggard, Observe her ways and be wise.
RCW 9.41.010
(9) "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.
Quotes are stupid. -The Mechanic
RCW 9.41.010
(9) "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.
Quotes are stupid. -The Mechanic